Hi all,
I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
(for instance).
Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
thank's.
Jerome
You can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
schema!).
You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
you need to full process your cube.
Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
this volume of data.
Marco Russo
http://www.sqlbi.eu
http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
Jerome wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
> will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
> that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
> change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
> (for instance).
> Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
> the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
> thank's.
> Jerome
|||Hi Marco,
What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
Thanks
Jerome
"Marco Russo" wrote:
> You can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
> changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
> schema!).
> You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
> single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
> you need to full process your cube.
> Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
> this volume of data.
> Marco Russo
> http://www.sqlbi.eu
> http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
>
> Jerome wrote:
>
|||yeah aggregation % in Analysis Services
-Susie
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
|||yeah % aggregation in analysis services
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
Showing posts with label datawarehousing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label datawarehousing. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Advice on database volume
Hi all,
I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
(for instance).
Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
thank's.
JeromeYou can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
schema!).
You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
you need to full process your cube.
Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
this volume of data.
Marco Russo
http://www.sqlbi.eu
http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
Jerome wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
> will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
> that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
> change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
> (for instance).
> Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
> the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
> thank's.
> Jerome|||Hi Marco,
What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
Thanks
Jerome
"Marco Russo" wrote:
> You can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
> changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
> schema!).
> You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
> single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
> you need to full process your cube.
> Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
> this volume of data.
> Marco Russo
> http://www.sqlbi.eu
> http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
>
> Jerome wrote:
>|||yeah aggregation % in Analysis Services
-Susie
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
>|||yeah % aggregation in analysis services
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
>sql
I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
(for instance).
Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
thank's.
JeromeYou can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
schema!).
You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
you need to full process your cube.
Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
this volume of data.
Marco Russo
http://www.sqlbi.eu
http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
Jerome wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm new to datawarehousing. I've built a DW with two fact tables, each one
> will be added with more than 5 to 10 millions rows each day. Do you think
> that this volume is compatible with Analysis Services 2005 or do I have to
> change the model I use, by creating a fact table for each customer I have
> (for instance).
> Second question: if the awnser of the previous question is that I can keep
> the model I've built, will I have to investigate cube partition ?
> thank's.
> Jerome|||Hi Marco,
What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
Thanks
Jerome
"Marco Russo" wrote:
> You can work with this volume of data in Analysis Services 2005 without
> changing your schema (and I strongly suggest you to not change your
> schema!).
> You can use partitions to handle this volume of data without having a
> single big partition that is hard to process if for whatever reasons
> you need to full process your cube.
> Be careful with aggregation design - you really need preaggregations on
> this volume of data.
> Marco Russo
> http://www.sqlbi.eu
> http://www.sqljunkies.com/weblog/sqlbi
>
> Jerome wrote:
>|||yeah aggregation % in Analysis Services
-Susie
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
>|||yeah % aggregation in analysis services
Jerome wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi Marco,
> What do you mean exactly by "aggregation design"?
> What is exactly preaggregation? Do you know some references on the web?
> Thanks
> Jerome
>
> "Marco Russo" wrote:
>sql
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)